Fork Type Flatmount attachement to the Chainstay?

Hi there,

I am preparing for a new road disc frame and - of course- want to use what I still have on stock. So I found some Syntace Dropouts and straight Columbus Life short taper chainstays. For using those I’d need to attach the Flatmount Attachements to the Chainstay. However, I don’t like the optics of those rather bulky round bosses and I also dislike the thought of removing almost all of the chainstay to make the outer boss fit.

So I just thought of using the front flatmount adapters for the forks and just adding two tabs with M5 thread to the chainstay.

Does that work? Any downside I oversee other than I have to use one of the adapters?

Also would appreciate some pics if anybody ever did so. Couldn’t find much in the web.

3 Likes

@DEVLINCC has done this on at least one frame. He might be able to give you some insight.

2 Likes

Yep, have done this to about 10 frames now and works well. No real tricks to it other than sticking to the interface standards that Shimano/Sram publish.

4 Likes

I’ve seen a few builders do that, and I’ve heard it being called the “Zullo Mount.” I guess that’s because one of the first builders to do it was Tiziano Zullo? Here are the ones I remember off the top of my head:

  • Zullo (obviously)
  • Legor
  • Rizzo
  • RS Cycles
  • Pegoretti

Have a look there and you will find some nice examples.

2 Likes

I had a go at this a while ago as I also thought it made sense. only photo I have on hand is a bit weird, but you get the picture. I notched for one, and drilled through for one, and soldered in threaded plugs, bike had seen ~5000km under me (90kg, big-gear grinder, sprinty, rough roads) no troubles so far, though I don’t like how much material was removed from the stay, so while it has been fine, I probably wouldnt do it this way again.

2 Likes

Thanks a lot. Checked the Pegoretti website and I think it looks pretty much how I thought. As a side note its also far easier to manufactur these bosses by myself on the lathe rather then the standard ones with the slotted holes.

1 Like

If you’re hoping to use the Columbus Life short taper chainstays, it’s probably worth modeling the assembly in CAD or doing a quick mock-up to verify that the caliper mounts can be positioned at the correct height relative to the axle – I think the forward boss will be close to the 30mm portion of the tube, and based on SRAM’s spec, that’s a no-go for a 140/160 rotor configuration and an extremely tight fit for 160/180 rotors. You might be able to offset the axle from the tube centerline to gain some wiggle room for the 160/180 configuration, but it’ll likely be a game of millimeters to get the short taper tube to work.

3 Likes

Good point. Did a short paper drawing. Looks like it could fit if I rotate the axis a bit from the chainstay middle axis.

3 Likes

It certainly works well. This is a Columbus XCR application. Basically a stainless bottle boss, drilled nearly dead center for the front most mount. Then a lathe turned mount notched for the rear.

4 Likes