The idea of making a commuter bike has been percolating in my small mind for a while now… a nice commuter bike… a comfortable commuter bike. I have some idea of what this means to me, but I want to see what it means to others.
This is a bike I could ride high as a kite, or a few beers deep, with no hands, and while making an important call. A bike that I can lock up in any part of my city, no matter the socioeconomic status. A bike that takes me where I need to go in the city, not where I want to go.
A robust bike. a sturdy bike. A bike I don’t have to care about (but I secretly do). I wanna ride it slowly and put it away wet… outside… while it’s still raining.
This, I will herein refer to this idea-of-a-bike as “Low Effort Cycling (LEC) konzept”.
Frame forum, I have two general questions that I would like to open this discussion with:
1) What does LEC mean to you? e.g. how much luggage? how light? how sturdy? how pretty? tyre width? etc.
2) Does anybody have sort of general guidelines for LEC konzept bikes in the Dutch style?* I’m quite enamoured with the Dutch… style of city bike.
Regarding the latter question, I have looked into the first company that sprang to mind when I thought about LEC, “Gazelle”, and it seems that they no longer make non-electric bikes. This fills my heart with heavy material, possibly sadness or lead or maybe even depleted uranium. Does anyone here have any recommendations or ideas as to the general guiding principles of such bikes, e.g. BB-HT/grip lengths.
For examples, have heard the super slack seat tube angles allow one frame size to fit a large range of riders (size wise). This is LEC konzept.
P.S. I’m not an e-bike hater (in fact I think they are quite neat!) but I personally feel that for a non-cargo bike, the mechanical and philosophical elegance of the traditional bicycle (no external power other than burgers and dessert) reigns supreme.