TLDR: I’m interested in building my manual lathe skills by making a titanium axle for a rim brake rear hub, like a Shimano 105 FH-7000. I’m asking how strong Grade 5 Titanium would be vs the standard steel axle, because I’m unsure of the engineering behind how Young’s modulus, tensile strength, and yield strength play into this.
The way this idea came about is I’ve been planning a wheel build for awhile for my rim brake bike with the brief being: cheapish, quiet freehub, lightish. Cheap and quiet free hub in 2024 means some sort of Shimano hub, but they’re not that light, even if you spend dura ace money. At the same time, I’ve started learning the manual lathe.
The steel axle has significant mass, and it’s little more than a hollow threaded rod. Much of the weight savings from Ultegra 6800 hubs and DA 9000 hubs is probably in their aluminum axle design. They use a larger diameter axle, which like the tubes in a bike frame makes sense for increasing strength with a weaker material like 7075 aluminum. In a normal cup and cone rear hub, there’s normally a few mm of clearance between the axle and cups to play with, but then you have to make new cones, locknuts, etc.
Googling the mechanical properties of Grade 5 titanium vs 4130 steel, it looks like the yield strength and tensile strength of titanium are much greater. Of course, the Young’s modulus is less than steel, but does that matter for a hub axle as much as it does for a frame? If the yield strength is better than steel, then it should be safe to make a titanium axle to the same dimensions as the original steel one and expect it to be lighter and strong enough to not bend, no? I don’t have an engineering background, so I’m very much in the dark about this.
As a lathe project, drilling such a tiny, deep through hole seems like a challenge, but otherwise it’s basically a 150mm threaded rod. The first place I googled sold Grade 5 3/8" round bar for $40/ft (sorry for burger units), so not prohibitively expensive to give it a shot. Winter is closing in, and I’m feeling restless for a project, so I understand if this doesn’t sound like the most pragmatic project ever thought of, but at worst a useful thought exercise for understanding material properties a little better.