I am glad you asked! I was waiting for someone to take the bait
Just look at the name: 2023 was promoted as “MADE handmade show”. For 2024, the “handmade” disappeared.
To be clear, I’m not taking a side for or against big bike, medium companies, small framebuilders, Chinese, Taiwanese, South American, or American bikes. I am also not against MADE, I thought it was a really cool show, much better than Sea Otter. However, I think framebuilders, event promoters, and bike companies need an honest conversation about who is using who, and how we can help each other.
I think people love Neuhaus and Artefact, as well as my mission, but the number of leads we got was less than 10. I can’t trace a direct sale from the last two years to Portland. In comparison, the last time I did a 1hr podcast, we probably got 2-3 sales. People going to those shows are going because they love bikes, not because they are shopping for a custom bike.
The Problem:
We had a humble presence this year, yet it still costs >$1000 in logistics, $1500 for our booth + displays. In order to show our best work, we have to build our own complete bikes. Customer bikes will never have the right buildkit, or the right timing. A show bike easily costs $2000-3000 out of pocket. Even if you build it for a buddy, that is not making money. You end up sending $5k+ and several weeks of time (the biggest cost) to attend these shows.
What is the net result? 5 sentences and a few photos packaged in a gallery with 10 other builders. This is not the media’s fault either. Their budgets are neutered because of the shifting landscape of advertising dollars. Our great American framebuilder Rob English was doing double duty covering for Escape Collective and manning his booth. I am sure the outlets that sent their full-time staff lost money on the event. Marketing and advertising are so optimized that the little guys (builders and independent media companies) get steamrolled.
Results:
So what is the net result of $7k, weeks of prep, and 4 days of backbreaking work?
- First bike featured on Escape (Thanks Rob! )
- Cover photo on Radavist Day 5
- Two bikes on Radavist Day 4
- A few 1-2min clips on Youtube (BikeSauce, Gravel Cyclist)
- +50 IG followers
Is that worth it? I guess that is for the consumer to decide. We worked HARD to get our bikes onto those outlets. We had friends volunteer time to staff our booth so Nick and I could network (and so Nick could race BMX ). We are lucky to have already built connections with media. I feel bad for brands like Cherubim who flew all the way from Japan but had almost no coverage. Even worse, for the new builders who have to fake it to make it, but didn’t make it.
There is also a potential conflict of interest, whether intentional or not. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that the bike frame companies that ECHOS represents end up in every media outlet with favorable positioning. I mean, I don’t blame anyone. Those companies make great bikes and they pay ECHOS to do exactly that! However, it is a grey area that I wish did not exist. I am paying to be a part of a show with the premise of selling bikes, but that show’s parent company gets paid monthly to represent competitors? I do believe MADE is aware of this and does its best to prevent favoritism, but the conflict of interest is inevitable. One medium sized bike “brand” didn’t even have a booth, yet they ended up on multiple publications? Oh. Wait. That bike might have taken the spot of a small builder who paid to attend the show.
I am not saying those bigger companies don’t belong. I like that smaller brands with non-hand made frames get featured (Ritchey, OTSO, etc). I think it elevates everyone’s work. However, we need to be more realistic about how framebuilders compare to mid-size companies.
What to do?
I knew this going into MADE, which is why I spent so much time making my MADE video:
That video has 700hrs of watch time. In comparison, how long do you think people glanced at our bike photos or even read the web copy? In 2024, you have to tell your own story. You can’t rely on others to do so.
There is a model for what could work. The smart builders at the show, like LaMarche and Amigo, built a bike and placed it in a bigger company’s booth. They didn’t have to bring a massive display; they got to walk around, talk to media, and network. However, this only works if you already are a “framebuilder personality” and have connections with a company and with media (not to mention they both build really awesome bikes).
So here is a potential solution:
- Framebuilders who want to go to the show should write a proposal for a frame (style of frame, vision, price).
- Companies attending the show (shimano, campy, reserve wheels, I9, Astral, King, etc…) should be required to bid on (pay for) those frames from builders and provide the parts kit.
- Builders build the bike, assemble, and get it to the show
- The company displays those bikes in their own booths
- The builders who were not selected can be placed in a free “handbuilt section,” classic car show style.
- If builders want their own booth, go ahead and pay for it.
Maybe that works, maybe its worse. Regardless, we need to talk more openly about this stuff, or it ain’t gonna change.
To be clear, I’m not just complaining. I really enjoyed the show, loved chatting with builders and the public. The Escape and Radavist features still make me feel proud of my work, and with my youtube video, I was able to use MADE to promote myself to another level. However, that was a TON of work, and I think for 95% of other builders, they were not as lucky as me.