A while back I reverse-engineered the SRAM 8-bolt spline for their current generation cranks.
The 3D printed test piece I made has a way better fit than SRAM’s own chainrings.
Regardless, before I go ahead with ordering a custom 8-bolt 104 BCD spider for someone to use a Gates belt sprocket with SRAM’s T-type cranks, I figured I’d share it here and also invite others to upload their reverse-engineered interfaces for a sanity check.
I decided I didn’t know how to express the differences. But this is the one I have. All I did was 3D print a test, so I don’t know if yours or mine is better.
Found my 3D printed test-piece and the fit wasn’t as good as I remembered it to be (I got it mixed up with another project). Still as good as SRAM, but I’d prefer a tighter fit.
So I ended up going back to the beginning. Purchased some radius gauges and reverse-engineered the interface from scratch again.
I’ve got some spiders on order and should have them within a few weeks.
I’ll report back with a report on how well they fit (or don’t fit).
Received the 104BCD spiders I needed to reverse-engineer the 8-bolt interface for.
Made this spider to work with a SRAM T-Type crank to provide a 55mm chainline/beltline suitable for use with Rohloff hubs (their standard QR model has a 55mm belt line as standard).
I’m pretty happy with the fit.
It’s quite disturbing that the standard SRAM fit is so sloppy.
FYI all.
I’ve updated the original post with the STEP file and DXF of the 8-bolt spline interface and bolt pattern used for the spider in the video in my previuos reply.