Please excuse me if I missed it, but is anyone using titanium to make racks? If so, what tubing? Given the limited availability and price of 5/16 .028 4130, I was toying with the idea of titanium for a light weight rack. Many thanks, Daniel
2 Likes
Yes… I thought about that, but the idea is to carry just a duffel… small one, so I don’t think I need a stopper…
I don’t really know anyone who’s making out of titanium… but for sure there are people here…
that is planned to be my introduction to titanium welding… but haven’t looked much for tubes yet.,
2 Likes
Tubus makes (or made?) Ti racks, but with the usual cost-cutting that any mass-producer needs to do, like tubes just welded to the side of another tube without a miter. I expect anyone here can do better than that.
3Al/2.5V is the “good” alloy, originally made as high-performance hydraulic tube for aircraft, so it’s meant to be good for bending, without so much of the thinning that tends to occur in the outer edge of the bend. I don’t know of anyone who sells it in the diameters you want for racks, but I haven’t looked. I see Online Metals only sells Grade 2, which is commercially-pure Ti, not alloy. Much weaker than 3/2.5. Dunno what Tubus uses but I would be surprised if they’re using alloy — probably CP. Which is so weak I wouldn’t bother, just use SS if you want corrosion-resistance or 4130 if you want light weight.
3/2.5, if you can get it, has a low stiffness-to-strength ratio, so if you use the same diameter as steel and build it to the same strength, it’ll be much more flexible. Usually not good in a rack that carries substantial weight. Extra wiggle in the cargo has bad effects on handling. Probably just fine for a light load like a typical handlebar bag though. But then, with those little Hbar bag racks, the potential for weight savings is small because you can make them so dang light in steel, so why bother with all that extra hassle of Ti? Just for bragging rights? Getting to the top of the hill milliseconds faster?
3 Likes
How about 1/4" x .028" then? Even lighter, and Aircraft Spruce sells it (no doubt others too but it’s the first place I looked.)
Not suitable for heavy loads, but plenty for a typical Hbar bag, assuming proper design. That mostly means no curved struts in the load path down to the fork. Compression columns need to be straight.
2 Likes
Great input bulgie, just the perspective I was after!
1 Like
I had some spare time and energy today so I decided to build a pannier rack for my touring bike. Did a quick cardboard dummy but I realised how odd it looked with the bag so far behind the front wheel axle.
I’m wondering if there’s a best practice or anyone has experience with weight distribution. Should the weight be on top of the axle? Is the trail (or any other parameter) a part of the calculation?
For info this is a short trail (42mm) bike.
Would love some input before I’m cutting up any steel 
Cardboard dummy
Bag centered on cardboard dummy
Bag centered over axle
2 Likes
In my experience having the weight slightly behind the axle is better since its less likely to give you a “tipping forward” feeling. Most of that experience is with basket/porter style racks though. The lower position of a pannier rack means it’ll be pretty stable no matter what. I think it does look better on centre if that matters to ya though.
1 Like
I agree that having the pannier centered in the wheel looks best. However, sometimes you have to compromise depending on the size of the bag.
-Jim G
2 Likes
Sweet, thanks for the input!
The bags will be small, so I might try to get it a little behind the axle without making it look ugly
1 Like
Made a video of me building a custom rack.
I filmed it during the winter so I’ve been upgrading a bit on my tooling for my Silver Heron production rack since but if anyone can use it or if you just enjoy frame building ASMR, here you go:
6 Likes